Sulemania

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
despazito

fren-in-your-computr asked:

Can u tell me why breeding scaleless snakes are bad? /genuinely asking (im not trying to pick a fight- im just trying to understand 😊)

is-the-snake-video-cute answered:

Sure thing! The basic idea is that scales are really important to how a snake functions, and when you mess with that, you tamper with the snake’s ability to be a snake.

Scaleless rat/cornsnakes are unethical but they’re not, like, the worst thing ever. The snake will still have belly scutes but lack scales on their backs and sides. The main issues a scaleless rat/corn will suffer from are:

  • Mobility issues caused by the lack of scales along the sides. Snake movement is complex and involves muscles attached to the belly and side scales, so without side scales, they’re clumsy and have issues holding on to things
  • Shedding issues
  • Increased risk of injury - snake skin really isn’t meant to just be exposed

Unethical! But it could be worse.

image

Scaleless ball pythons are such an unethical morph I consider breeding them to be animal abuse, full-stop. The scaleless morph in ball pythons is more extreme than rat/corns, and also involves the loss of belly scales.

Along with the issues scaleless rat/corns deal with, scaleless ball pythons also suffer through:

  • Even worse mobility issues due to the lack of belly scales, which are the most important when it comes to mobility
  • Belly sores - that’s a load-bearing part of the body that’s now unprotected
  • Massive, massive difficulty eating. Ball pythons have heat pits on their lips to detect infrared signatures, and that’s what they rely on to eat. These pits are set into the scales, and the scaleless morph doesn’t know what to do with them so they’re just gone. Scaleless bps are left not being able to use the way they’ve evolved to hunt and find food.

There’s a reason you can’t find any scaleless ball pythons who are full-grown.

image

Because of all these issues, I consider it unethical to breed scaleless snakes, and I strongly recommend avoiding buying from anyone who breeds them.

animals snakes
ct4cd
bobbyfischers-kingsidebishop

No matter how “sick nasty”, “mad dope” or “masterfully crafted” your LP’s cover art is, it will never match the raw dragon energy on display on the front of Supertramp’s ‘Breakfast in America’

bobbyfischers-kingsidebishop

image

100% STEEZ

fans-on-the-run

True fact: this cover was such a hit that they hired the model to go on tour with them. She would go on stage in the waitress uniform and introduce the band. Changed her life!

megapope

image
world-guardian

“Model” That’s Kate Murtagh, who had a career as an actress and singer for 30 years before that album came out

ct4cd

Also the title track, “The Logical Song” and “Take the Long Way Home” totally slap actually and I’m sick of pretending they don’t

music
noc-tua
mostly-funnytwittertweets

image
firstgrave

[tweet by user YosarianTwo published June 7, 2023 at 7:33am. the tweet says:

“>woman offers to sell me a time machine

>ask if it creates branching time or a time loop

>she doesn’t understand

>I pull out a diagram showing branching time vs loops

>’it’s a good time machine’

>I buy the time machine

>it’s a time loop

>woman offers to sell me a time machine”

/end id]

shitposting sci-fi
shinvermouthea
ladyshinga

I’m sorry friends, but “just google it” is no longer viable advice. What are we even telling people to do anymore, go try to google useful info and the first three pages are just ads for products that might be the exact opposite of what the person is trying to find but The Algorithm thinks the words are related enough? And if it’s not ads it’s just sponsored websites filled with listicles, just pages and pages of “TOP FIFTEEN [thing you googled] IMAGINED AS DISNEY PRINCESSES” like… what are we even doing anymore, google? I can no longer use you as shorthand for people doing real and actual helpful research on their own.

cea-tide

Time to drop some links again.

https://searchmysite.net/
Search engine for the indie web, personal websites, digital gardens. You can also find them in websites like Neocities, Indieweb, Blogarama, and write.as. There is also a big list of personal websites.

https://search.marginalia.nu/
Search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and promotes websites that aren’t usually at the top of the list.

https://www.worldcat.org/
Search engine for items in libraries (books, but also maps, articles, sound recordings, theses, etc.)

https://scholar.google.com/
Search engine for scientific papers, reviews, etc. It’s still google, but a lot better than the normal search engine counterpart.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines
A list of search engines sorted by subject, area, and more. If you’re searching on a specific area, it might be worth checking if there is one focused on that area.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases_and_search_engines
A list of academic databases and search engines.

https://tineye.com/
Reverse image search alternative to Google’s.

Also, P.S.: Please stop using Google, and start using more privacy focused search engines, like DuckDuckGo or SearchX (opensource; personally haven’t used it yet, but it looks promising for privacy-focused users)

myalgias

That Google and Meta can get away with this during an era of intense misinformation and disinformation signals that we cannot rely on large tech companies to provide reliable access to information and news: